abdera-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James M Snell <jasn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Performance and the Registered Alternates mechanism
Date Sat, 15 Jul 2006 03:44:43 GMT
The motivation was to have a means of inserting an alternate
implementation of, say, FOMEntry that implemented custom behaviors
without having to create a new FOMFactory subclass.  However, the
approach is actually bit bogus (IMHO).

- James

Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 7/14/06, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Rob Yates did some performance testing earlier today on the latest code
>> to find that resource use has jumped considerably.  I suspected that the
>> culprit was the alternatives mechanism I added a couple of weeks ago.
>> After doing some investigation, that does appear to be the case.  Given
>> that Rob was the one who had the use case that needed alternatives,
>> hopefully he'll weigh in on whether or not they're actually still needed
>> :-).  I'd love to back that change back out.
> 
> What was the use case that prompted their addition?
> 
> -garrett
> 

Mime
View raw message