Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-abdera-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 82226 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2006 23:35:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jun 2006 23:35:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 77038 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2006 23:35:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-abdera-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77004 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2006 23:35:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact abdera-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 76995 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2006 23:35:10 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:35:10 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of rooneg@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.168 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.168] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:35:09 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id q2so2259750uge for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:34:48 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=K0xcnajLAmkpmC4QF8jGlhC9KArIclLq7iv4Uaekwdz2Rlv67B3b+WfuBLnEtHeZ50Twu/Yt1SAAZLp9QrY4sFxVrNNmbZyz+6VzxGAGa6L2azWNpL2+pGFOPUzjClW1wn6L01bbNZqMW9gANJ4stTaume7FkUGUfSll8+hIPeU= Received: by 10.78.165.16 with SMTP id n16mr41419hue; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:34:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.81.7 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:34:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7edfeeef0606271634s6f60cc5fw6ed93d1b7feec8d7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 19:34:48 -0400 From: "Garrett Rooney" Sender: rooneg@gmail.com To: abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: XHTML Content In-Reply-To: <35379c520606271625h781a8c15w1032bb3a27ef7b5d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <68fba5c50606271205r6daccc11k386b3ab1fe594ac1@mail.gmail.com> <44A186F2.8090801@gmail.com> <68fba5c50606271446n6276de99sd150586a757e65ed@mail.gmail.com> <68fba5c50606271520g32f217b1s6b982ebefe994dee@mail.gmail.com> <35379c520606271625h781a8c15w1032bb3a27ef7b5d@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1251c3d830283779 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 6/27/06, joe kim wrote: > Some nice difference of opinion here. If you guys do not mind, can > there be a clarification on the intent of this discussion? > > Is the discussion on whether Entry.getContent() will return the "div" > tag or not? > > From the discussion it seems to make sense that Entry.getContent() not > return the div, but instead have a method called > Entry.getContentAsXhtml() return the "div" in case the programmer > needs it to "aid in displaying the content." Honestly, if they need it to "aid in displaying the content" can't they just tack it back on themselves? I don't see a need to include a separate method to do what the user can easily do for themselves... Out of curiosity, what do other atom parsers (other than Mozilla's) do? -garrett