Mailing-List: contact abdera-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of eliast@gmail.com designates
 64.233.162.202 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender;
        b=ADswTgXc7UejfPdz+ISAB+z78TtyWBv+foGr1bpLZj/ffjmnVaT52v3XQijk68oSgVJ2zu0dxTiwGL8DvhLMqmKLltAdpqCQog7ahZJrbKYoYi7cxt4qP4KcnnSAGVfetZ641T/viRXDJWp1TOauNA8JJRvPYy+I6VLrPCXSuTo=
Message-ID: <44940FCE.9010308@torrez.us>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 10:21:02 -0400
From: Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Now that the code's in
References: <200606171412.k5HECcbD014153@mail.e-wire.net.au>
In-Reply-To: <200606171412.k5HECcbD014153@mail.e-wire.net.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: Elias Torres <eliast@gmail.com>


Gav.... wrote:
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rooneg@gmail.com [mailto:rooneg@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Garrett
>> Rooney
>> Sent: Saturday, 17 June 2006 9:27 PM
>> To: abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org; brightoncomputers@brightontown.com.au
>> Subject: Re: Now that the code's in
>>
>> On 6/17/06, Gav.... <brightoncomputers@brightontown.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>> It may just be these projects, but it seems to me that the layout of the
>>> Repository here is a little weird.
>>>
>>> I mean, why have two trunks ? , Can the website not be part of the same
>>> trunk, it would make for easier maintenance and deployment in the
>>> Future, ease of use and readability for users etc also.
>> I'm not clear how putting the web site in with the source has anything
>> to do with deployment...  The main reason I saw in keeping them
>> separate is that eventually I see us as having multiple
>> implementations of Abdera in different languages, and I don't see any
>> need to force people to check out all of them in order to get the
>> parts they want.
> 
> That's fine. Will the website become i18n compliant to cope with the
> documentation needed for these languages?

I think he meant programming languages. Why should people check java
when all they want is Python or C++.