abdera-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stephen Duncan" <stephen.dun...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: XHTML Content
Date Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:01:32 GMT
God-blast it.  That should be "I'm NOT trying to make..." :)

-Stephen

On 6/27/06, Stephen Duncan <stephen.duncan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Come on now, play nice.  I'm trying to make a tortured reading; I'm
> attempting to make the most clear reading from the text.  The HTML
> section says "that markup" right after referring to the DIV that it
> could validly appear within.  I'm sorry, but the clearest reading of
> that means that you're referring to the div.  But it's ambiguous.
>
> On rereading, however, I realize that the XHTML section simply says
> "the markup" (I'd previously skimmed and I guess assumed it said
> "that" like the HTML section does), and therefore means exactly as you
> said.  And again, on the parallel tex theory, based on this I'd revise
> my guess at the meaning of the HTML seciton to mean the HTML markup.
>
> I was agreeing with you in the first place regarding the validity of
> including the DIV as content, so I was certainly not trying to subvert
> the meaning.  Like it or not, the mismatched language in the two
> sections means that it's not clear; there was no tortured reading,
> only a genuine effort to understand the text.
>
> -Stephen
>
> On 6/27/06, Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 6/27/06, Stephen Duncan <stephen.duncan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > meaning that if it helps, you can surround the content with a div (I
> > > don't think Robert is correct in it referring to the content).
> >
> > Sorry guys. I was there, I know what the WG meant, and I know I am
> > correct. Don't try to subvert it with a tortured reading.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Robert Sayre
> >
>
>
> --
> Stephen Duncan Jr
> www.stephenduncanjr.com
>


-- 
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com

Mime
View raw message