abdera-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James M Snell <jasn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: The Feed Object Model
Date Fri, 09 Jun 2006 20:39:25 GMT
Works for me. The lazy consensus thing is really what I had in mind
anyway.  :-)

- James

Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 6/9/06, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The central and most critical component of Abdera is it's Feed Object
>> Model interfaces (all of the interfaces defined in the "core"
>> component).  Our lives will be much more difficult if these interfaces
>> are not stable.  I'd like to propose that for the core package only, we
>> adopt an approve-first approach to all check-in's following the initial
>> check-in.  In other words, any change to the core interfaces would need
>> to be proposed first on the dev list for a vote before the change is
>> actually made.  Doing so is purely for reasons of maintaining stability
>> and making sure that everyone is aware of changes being made to the core
>> API.
> 
> I don't see any problem with asking people to propose changes to this
> stuff on the dev list before committing, but requiring an actual vote
> for any change to it seems kind of extreme.  Perhaps a lazy consensus
> would work.  If someone proposes a change on the list and nobody
> objects within a certain amount of time they can assume that it's ok
> to proceed.  I mean worst case we can always revert a change that
> turns out to be problematic, and avoiding unnecessary bureaucracy is
> generally a good thing IMO.
> 
> -garrett
> 

Mime
View raw message