abdera-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James M Snell <jasn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Initial Repository Layout
Date Thu, 08 Jun 2006 22:03:20 GMT
Right, this is exactly what I was thinking for the sandbox.  I am the
author of quite a few Atom extension drafts that I would like to play
around with implementing.  Having a sandbox to play around in is
easier/better than messing around with a branch in that, unless the
extension is broadly adopted, likely won't ever make it into the core

I'm fine either way, however.

- James

Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 6/8/06, Paul Querna <pquerna@apache.org> wrote:
>> What is the difference between a 'sandbox' and a
>> branches/paul-is-trying-something-crazy?
>> I don't see much reason to not just use branches/ for that purpose.
> For branches, I agree, an experimental branch to make radical changes
> just to try them out is just that, a branch, and goes under branches/.
> A sandbox, IIUC, is something different, it's for new work, not
> modifications to existing code, and is for work that may or may not
> ever make it into the trunk.
> For example, see
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/sandbox/ for the
> Jakarta Commons sandbox.  It's filled with random little projects that
> may never really see production use.
> Depending on the type of work people do, we may never need a sandbox.
> If the type of experimental work that goes on is such that it lends
> itself to branch based development, then that makes perfect sense.
> On the other hand, I could see sandbox projects for implementing
> specific Atom extensions that may or may not ever become widely used.
> -garrett

View raw message