abdera-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gav...." <brightoncomput...@brightontown.com.au>
Subject RE: Now that the code's in
Date Sat, 17 Jun 2006 14:25:39 GMT


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elias Torres [mailto:eliast@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Elias Torres
> Sent: Saturday, 17 June 2006 10:21 PM
> To: abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Now that the code's in
> 
> 
> 
> Gav.... wrote:
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: rooneg@gmail.com [mailto:rooneg@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Garrett
> >> Rooney
> >> Sent: Saturday, 17 June 2006 9:27 PM
> >> To: abdera-dev@incubator.apache.org;
> brightoncomputers@brightontown.com.au
> >> Subject: Re: Now that the code's in
> >>
> >> On 6/17/06, Gav.... <brightoncomputers@brightontown.com.au> wrote:
> >>
> >>> It may just be these projects, but it seems to me that the layout of
> the
> >>> Repository here is a little weird.
> >>>
> >>> I mean, why have two trunks ? , Can the website not be part of the
> same
> >>> trunk, it would make for easier maintenance and deployment in the
> >>> Future, ease of use and readability for users etc also.
> >> I'm not clear how putting the web site in with the source has anything
> >> to do with deployment...  The main reason I saw in keeping them
> >> separate is that eventually I see us as having multiple
> >> implementations of Abdera in different languages, and I don't see any
> >> need to force people to check out all of them in order to get the
> >> parts they want.
> >
> > That's fine. Will the website become i18n compliant to cope with the
> > documentation needed for these languages?
> 
> I think he meant programming languages. Why should people check java
> when all they want is Python or C++.

Er, oops.

Gav...


> 
> 
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.0/368 - Release Date: 6/16/2006



Mime
View raw message